Wednesday, October 8, 2008

De-Bunking the Shanahan Return...

It's flowing everywhere today - Brendan Shanahan is going to be a Ranger. Well, atleast if you believe the hype. To be honest, the Rangers can't sign him yet. There would have to be some tinkering with the line-up. With under a quarter of a million dollars in Cap space available, salary would have to be moved.

I personally think Shanahan won't become a Ranger. If he does sign with the team, I will be the first to sauté my words with a little garlic and oil and eat them. However, for the following reasons, I don't see it happening...

1) They already have 15 NHL-caliber forwards. Yes, I called Colton Orr "NHL-caliber."

2) He doesn't fit with "the new Rangers." Meaning, he isn't a speedy young gun like they are trying to become. 

3) Shanahan missed all of training camp. At his age, it will take a while for him to get into game shape. He will need at least 10 or so games to get to the point where he was at the beginning of last season. Why do that when you already have 15 forwards who are healthy, in shape, and ready to play? Why waste the time? Especially when the Rangers have harped on the fact that they need a fast start, unlike the past 2 years when they only made the playoffs because of a) Sean Avery and b) a late-season rally.

4) They won 4 points in 2 games. The Lightning lost both games, got thoroughly outplayed, and traded immediately for an upgrade at defense. The Rangers won both games, and while they didn't light the scoreboard up, there were no glaring holes needing to be filled by an over-the-hill, injured, former superstar.

5) He had nothing left at the end of last year. Yes, he had hip and knee problems, but did those heal up? From mid-January on, he had nothing in the tank, save for Game One against the Devils in the playoffs. Freddy Sjostrom, Petr Prucha, Patrick Rissmiller, and Dan Fritsche will give you the same effort in May as they will in the home opener against Chicago. The same can't be said for Shanahan.

6) He offers nothing they don't already have. Ten years ago, twelve years ago, the thought of having Shanahan around for 70 regular season games would cause me to kiss ugly babies. Now? Not so much. He was never very fast, he was just smart and a gritty power forward with a great wrist shot. Naslund, Dawes, and Zherdev have that great wrist shot. Drury, Callahan, Prucha, and others have that "never quit" attitude. Sjostrom, Voros, and Rissmiller throw the body around. Dawes is positioning himself in front of the net on the power play. And all of those players are younger and fresher than him and won't crap out after the all-star break.

Listen, I love him. I think he was a great Ranger for two years, and he is a first-ballot Hall of Famer. I just think making room for him when the season has already started would be a grave mistake.

2 comments:

  1. On NHL Live - or at least the part of NHL Live I heard when Kylie wasn't screaming in my ear - they were saying how Shanahan would be mainly a locker room-type of guy and how bringing him back wouldn't necessarily be a hockey decision. They went on to say that if he was only going to play 9 minutes a night, they should trade him. Easy, Don and E.J.; we're not talking about Brett Favre here. I think he'll come back eventually, especially if the Rangers get hit with injuries (they will).

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete